sde
Interview Date
19-08-2026
Result
Selected
Difficulty
Easy
Rounds
01
Drive Type
Off-Campus
Topics asked
Detailed experience
PART 1: ALGORITHMIC PROBLEM - DIGIT DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING BASE PROBLEM You are analyzing a massive dataset of sequential IDs to find those that match a specific cryptographic checksum property. Task: Given two integers `L` and `R` (where 1 <= L <= R <= 10^18), design an algorithm to find the total number of integers in the inclusive range `[L, R]` where the sum of their digits is exactly equal to a target value `S`. Since iterating from `L` to `R` takes O(R) time and will result in a Time Limit Exceeded (TLE) error, how do you model this as a Digit DP state machine (tracking the current index, the current digit sum, and a boolean flag for whether the prefix is tightly bound by the upper limit) to solve it in strictly O(log10(R) * S) time? FOLLOW-UP 1 The checksum rules are updated to include a divisibility constraint. The ID must have a digit sum of `S` AND the integer itself must be perfectly divisible by an integer `K` (where 1 <= K <= 100). How do you expand your Digit DP state space to track the modulo remainder at each step, and how does this impact the overall time and space complexity? FOLLOW-UP 2 The IDs are now generated using massive cryptographic strings. The upper bound `R` can now have up to `N = 10^5` digits. The target sum `S` and modulo `K` constraints are removed, but a new constraint is added: the ID cannot contain the contiguous substring "1337". Using a standard multi-dimensional Digit DP array will immediately exceed the memory limits. How do you design an Aho-Corasick automaton to track the substring matching state, and how do you combine it with Matrix Exponentiation to compute the number of valid sequences in strictly O(log N * M^3) time, where M is the number of states in the automaton? ------------------------------------------------ PART 2: SYSTEM DESIGN - HIGH-CONCURRENCY FLASH SALE SYSTEM BASE PROBLEM You are designing the inventory and checkout backend for a massive e-commerce platform. You are hosting a "Flash Sale" for a highly anticipated product. There are 10,000 units in stock, but 5 million users will click "Buy" in the exact same second. Design the high-level architecture to handle this massive write-heavy spike without crashing, ensuring that exactly 10,000 units are sold and zero overselling occurs. FOLLOW-UP 1 A naive approach relies on placing a row-level lock on the product's inventory count in your relational database (e.g., `SELECT stock FROM inventory WHERE item_id = X FOR UPDATE`). Under the load of 5 million concurrent requests, database lock contention will cause transaction timeouts and catastrophic connection pool exhaustion. How do you design a distributed queueing mechanism and an atomic decrement operation (e.g., using Redis Lua scripts) to definitively authorize purchases in memory before they ever touch the persistent database? FOLLOW-UP 2 To protect the backend, you implement a Virtual Waiting Room system where users are placed in a queue and gradually granted authorization tokens to access the checkout page. However, scalpers are deploying thousands of distributed bots to flood the waiting room, squeezing out legitimate human users. How do you design a robust edge-layer defense (using Rate Limiting, Proof-of-Work challenges, and behavioral fingerprinting) to dynamically throttle bot traffic before it enters the queue? ------------------------------------------------ PART 3: AI / LLM DISCUSSION QUESTIONS In the context of next-generation foundational models, how do State Space Models (SSMs) like Mamba fundamentally differ from the Transformer architecture in terms of their time complexity relative to sequence length, and how do they avoid the quadratic bottleneck of standard Self-Attention? What is Constitutional AI (or RLAIF - Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback), and how does it reduce the dependency on massive, expensive human-annotated datasets during the alignment phase of a Large Language Model? Explain the concept of "Contrastive Decoding." How does generating text by maximizing the probability difference between a massive "expert" model and a smaller "amateur" model lead to more logical, less repetitive text generation compared to standard greedy decoding? When deploying a multi-agent framework (like AutoGen or CrewAI), what are the architectural patterns used to prevent independent agents from falling into infinite conversational loops or hallucination spirals, and how is state shared across the agent swarm?